Kelsey Smith & Co. v. Westermann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelsey Smith & Co. v. Westermann

170 A.D. 919, 154 N.Y.S. 1128

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 170 A.D. 919 (Kelsey Smith & Co. v. Westermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelsey Smith & Co. v. Westermann, 170 A.D. 919, 154 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this ease may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Decision and judgment modified so as to reduce the finding of the amount of plaintiff’s lien by $435 held by McKinley, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. The 7th conclusion of law in the proposed conclusions of law is reversed. Let the order show findings in accordance with this determination. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this ease may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Decision and judgment modified so as to reduce the finding of the amount of plaintiff’s lien by $435 held by McKinley, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. The 7th conclusion of law in the proposed conclusions of law is reversed. Let the order show findings in accordance with this determination. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 A.D. 919, 154 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelsey-smith-co-v-westermann-nyappdiv-1915.