Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Dr. Robert E. Weimer

Sixth Circuit

Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Dr. Robert E. Weimer

244 F.2d 955, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3184

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 16, 1957

Docket13063

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 244 F.2d 955 (Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Dr. Robert E. Weimer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Dr. Robert E. Weimer, 244 F.2d 955, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3184 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appel-lees, and Kelsey D. Bartlett, appellant in propria persona, and the court being duly advised,

Now therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the order of the district court sustaining a motion for an order quashing service of process upon appellees and dismissing the action as to them, be affirmed upon the authority of Marten v. Holbrook, C.C.N.D.Cal., *956 157 F. 716; Whittington v. Johnston, D.C., 102 F.Supp. 352, affirmed, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 810; and Kenney v. Fox, 6 Cir., 232 F.2d 288, relied upon by Judge Kloeb in his order sustaining appellees’ motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appel-lees, and Kelsey D. Bartlett, appellant in propria persona, and the court being duly advised,

Now therefore, It is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the order of the district court sustaining a motion for an order quashing service of process upon appellees and dismissing the action as to them, be affirmed upon the authority of Marten v. Holbrook, C.C.N.D.Cal., *956 157 F. 716; Whittington v. Johnston, D.C., 102 F.Supp. 352, affirmed, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 810; and Kenney v. Fox, 6 Cir., 232 F.2d 288, relied upon by Judge Kloeb in his order sustaining appellees’ motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 F.2d 955, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelsey-d-bartlett-v-dr-robert-e-weimer-ca6-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack