Kelmenson v. Kelmenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelmenson v. Kelmenson

254 A.D. 862, 5 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8064

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 862 (Kelmenson v. Kelmenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelmenson v. Kelmenson, 254 A.D. 862, 5 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that subsequent to the entry of the order appealed from a motion was made for reargument which was granted, altering the disposition of the matter as now presented. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to modify so as to provide that the matter be re-submitted to the arbitration board which should proceed to re-hear the same and make new findings limited, however, only to the parties to the written submission dated October 11, 1937, specifically stating the issues actually submitted and annexing to their findings a complete copy of the complaint specifying such issues and the answer of the petitioner if one was filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that subsequent to the entry of the order appealed from a motion was made for reargument which was granted, altering the disposition of the matter as now presented. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to modify so as to provide that the matter be re-submitted to the arbitration board which should proceed to re-hear the same and make new findings limited, however, only to the parties to the written submission dated October 11, 1937, specifically stating the issues actually submitted and annexing to their findings a complete copy of the complaint specifying such issues and the answer of the petitioner if one was filed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 862, 5 N.Y.S.2d 299, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelmenson-v-kelmenson-nyappdiv-1938.