Kelm v. Kelm

736 N.E.2d 26, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1430, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2516
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 4, 2000
Docket00-1168
StatusPublished

This text of 736 N.E.2d 26 (Kelm v. Kelm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelm v. Kelm, 736 N.E.2d 26, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1430, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2516 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 99AP-747.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
736 N.E.2d 26, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1430, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelm-v-kelm-ohio-2000.