Kelly-Walker Development Co. v. Kipp Contractors, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Kelly-Walker Development Co. v. Kipp Contractors, Inc.

16 Mich. App. 737

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 21, 1969

DocketDocket No. 5,017

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Mich. App. 737 (Kelly-Walker Development Co. v. Kipp Contractors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly-Walker Development Co. v. Kipp Contractors, Inc., 16 Mich. App. 737 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover damages for breach of building contract and to cancel defendant contractor’s mechanic's lien on the property in question. Defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim asking for a judgment for balances due on the contract and for claimed extras arising out of the contract. After a lengthy [738]*738nonjury trial the court entered judgment for the defendant on his counterclaim in the amount of $2,727-.88 damages, plus costs. Plaintiff appeals and defendant cross-appeals.

On this appeal and cross-appeal the parties question the allowance or disallowance of various credits to each of the parties. The trial judge filed an opinion which states the disputed issues, the contentions of the parties, his findings of fact and the evidence supporting such findings and his conclusions of law. We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that the trial judge’s fact findings are not clearly erroneous. We adopt his conclusions of law.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover damages for breach of building contract and to cancel defendant contractor’s mechanic's lien on the property in question. Defendant filed an answer and a counterclaim asking for a judgment for balances due on the contract and for claimed extras arising out of the contract. After a lengthy [738]*738nonjury trial the court entered judgment for the defendant on his counterclaim in the amount of $2,727-.88 damages, plus costs. Plaintiff appeals and defendant cross-appeals.

On this appeal and cross-appeal the parties question the allowance or disallowance of various credits to each of the parties. The trial judge filed an opinion which states the disputed issues, the contentions of the parties, his findings of fact and the evidence supporting such findings and his conclusions of law. We have reviewed the record and are satisfied that the trial judge’s fact findings are not clearly erroneous. We adopt his conclusions of law.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Mich. App. 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-walker-development-co-v-kipp-contractors-inc-michctapp-1969.