Kelly v. Wehn

196 N.W. 703, 111 Neb. 446, 1923 Neb. LEXIS 139
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 31, 1923
DocketNo. 22642
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 196 N.W. 703 (Kelly v. Wehn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly v. Wehn, 196 N.W. 703, 111 Neb. 446, 1923 Neb. LEXIS 139 (Neb. 1923).

Opinion

Shepherd, District Judge.

The appellee, John R. Kelly, was the plaintiff in the district court, and the appellant, John H. Wehn, was the defendant. The former sued the latter to recover 52 per cent, of the face value of worthless assets — notes and shortages— of the Angora State Bank. It seems that Wehn owned 52 per cent, of the capital stock of said bank and sold it to Kelly under the following contract in writing:

“Angora, Nebraska, August 13, 1919.
“Received of J. R. Kelly of Angora, Nebraska, one thousand dollars, being part of first payment on purchase price of fifty-two shares of the capital stock of Angora State Bank of Angora, Nebraska, as follows: Fifty-two shares at actual value plus two thousand dollars premium, actual value to be determined as follows: All earnings of whatsoever nature to be computed to date and all expense and interest owing to be deducted; which result to be added to capital stock and surplus determines the actual value. Balance of purchase price to be paid on or before September 15, 1919.
“It is understood and agreed that J. H. Wehn, as selling party hereto, will take up 52 per cent, of any notes in bank [448]*448at date of transfer, which purchaser can show is worthless and uncollectible by October 15, 1919.
“It is understood and agreed that the purchaser will use his best efforts to collect without cost as they become due all rediscounts of seller. J. H. Wehn as selling party hereto agrees to pay 52 per cent, of any shortages which may be found and, should any shortages appear, seller will have the right and privilege to examine and audit any books and accounts that he may desire in connection with such shortages.
“J. H. Wehn agrees that he will not reengage in the banking business in Angora, Nebraska, within a period of five years. Upon full and complete payment being made as above provided, J. H. Wehn agrees to resign his position as vice president, also as director, and procure the resignation of J. W. Wehn as director and to assign his and J. W. Wehn’s stock to the order or J. R. Kelly.
“J. H. Wehn,
“J. R. Kelly.”

Following the execution of this contract, Wehn made and delivered to Kelly a written statement under date of September 12, 1919, of the assets and liabilities of the bank, including as assets under the name of loans and discounts all of the notes of the bank and a claim for $4,874.65 against the Fred L. Case estate. Kelly paid Wehn $9,344.48 for the stock according to the contract and then, having found by October 15, 1919, as he alleges, worthless notes and shortages among the assets of the bank amounting to practically $13,245.02, and having vainly demanded settlement therefor from Wehn, he brought the said action against said Wehn for 52 per cent, of such sum, or $6,885.84. Wehn denied all the material allegations of the lengthy petition, except the existence of the bank, his official connection with it, his ownership of 52 per cent, of its stock, the making of the said contract of sale, and the making of said written statement under date of September 12, 1919. He also appropriately and sufficiently pleaded all the defenses argued in his brief and hereafter considered in the [449]*449opinion. The court upon the conclusion of the trial directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Kelly, and against the defendant, Wehn, for 52 per cent, of the amount due September 12, 1919, on the following notes and accounts, less payments and credits thereon:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Gregory
371 N.W.2d 754 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Scott v. New England Mutual Life Insurance
260 N.W. 377 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1935)
Morgan v. United Benefit Life Insurance
241 N.W. 777 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 N.W. 703, 111 Neb. 446, 1923 Neb. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-wehn-neb-1923.