Kelly v. Wasserman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelly v. Wasserman

12 A.D.2d 645, 210 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6510

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 645 (Kelly v. Wasserman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Wasserman, 12 A.D.2d 645, 210 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6510 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to reform a deed to certain real property and in a summary proceeding by defendant against plaintiff to dispossess her from said property, the proceeding having been consolidated with the action and tried together, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 13, 1959, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the petition in the summary proceeding and directing that the deed be reformed to show that the property is subject to a life tenancy in favor of the plaintiff as long as her “ occupancy under said tenancy shall remain legal”. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to reform a deed to certain real property and in a summary proceeding by defendant against plaintiff to dispossess her from said property, the proceeding having been consolidated with the action and tried together, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 13, 1959, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the petition in the summary proceeding and directing that the deed be reformed to show that the property is subject to a life tenancy in favor of the plaintiff as long as her “ occupancy under said tenancy shall remain legal”. Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 645, 210 N.Y.S.2d 771, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-wasserman-nyappdiv-1960.