Kelly v. Villa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelly v. Villa

176 A.D.2d 992, 574 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13052

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 16, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 176 A.D.2d 992 (Kelly v. Villa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Villa, 176 A.D.2d 992, 574 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13052 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Best, J.), entered September 23, 1991 in Montgomery County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, to declare invalid the nominating petition naming respondent Mario Villa as the Leadership Party candidate for the office of Mayor of the City of Amsterdam in the November 5, 1991 general election.

Based on the record before us, we find that petitioner has failed to meet her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that respondent Mario Villa’s nominating petition was permeated by fraud and should be invalidated (see, Matter of Thomas v Simon, 89 AD2d 952, affd 57 NY2d 744).

[993]*993Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Best, J.), entered September 23, 1991 in Montgomery County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, to declare invalid the nominating petition naming respondent Mario Villa as the Leadership Party candidate for the office of Mayor of the City of Amsterdam in the November 5, 1991 general election.

Based on the record before us, we find that petitioner has failed to meet her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that respondent Mario Villa’s nominating petition was permeated by fraud and should be invalidated (see, Matter of Thomas v Simon, 89 AD2d 952, affd 57 NY2d 744).

[993]*993Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 A.D.2d 992, 574 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-villa-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack