Kelly v. Treu

520 A.2d 232, 9 Conn. App. 818, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 812
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedJanuary 16, 1987
Docket5040
StatusPublished

This text of 520 A.2d 232 (Kelly v. Treu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly v. Treu, 520 A.2d 232, 9 Conn. App. 818, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 812 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal by the defendant challenges a judgment rendered by the trial court on the ground that the facts found by the trial court were erroneous. An appellate court may not retry facts and its duty upon review of such a claim is limited to a determination of whether the trial court’s judgment was clearly erroneous in this respect or otherwise contrary to law. Cook v. Nye, 9 Conn. App. 221, 224-25, 518 A.2d 77 (1986). We have carefully reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and conclude that there is no error.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cook v. Nye
518 A.2d 77 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 A.2d 232, 9 Conn. App. 818, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-treu-connappct-1987.