Kelly v. Town of Chelmsford
This text of 13 F. App'x 11 (Kelly v. Town of Chelmsford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After affording plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint which “clearly and concisely” set forth his claims, and after two hearings on the matter, the district court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss. Reviewing the dismissal de novo in light of the briefs and the record, we see no error. The complaint failed to understandably state a cognizable claim for relief and some of the relief demanded was not within the court’s jurisdiction. Plaintiffs memorandum response to the court’s order to clarify suggested that plaintiff was unable or unwilling to cure the deficiencies.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 F. App'x 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-town-of-chelmsford-ca1-2001.