Kelly v. Supreme Court of Independent Order of Foresters

Appellate Court of Illinois

Kelly v. Supreme Court of Independent Order of Foresters

195 Ill. App. 501, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 381

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedDecember 8, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,085

StatusPublished

This text of 195 Ill. App. 501 (Kelly v. Supreme Court of Independent Order of Foresters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Supreme Court of Independent Order of Foresters, 195 Ill. App. 501, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 381 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Insurance, § 804*—when beneficiary not estopped to assert that suspension was unlawful. The fact that a member of a fraternal organization, who has been suspended, has signed a request for reinstatement does not estop him from asserting that such suspension was unlawful. 5. Insurance, § 854*—when action on mutual benefit certificate not prematurely brought. If when a claim is presented against defendant, a fraternal organization, it at first denies liability, an action brought without exhausting certain remedies as required by defendant’s by-laws is not prematurely brought, although such by-laws are expressly made part of the contract, and though plaintiff is expressly required thereby to exhaust such remedies before bringing suit, for the reason that in such case defendant is precluded from setting up the provisions of such by-laws as a defense to the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Insurance, § 804*—when beneficiary not estopped to assert that suspension was unlawful. The fact that a member of a fraternal organization, who has been suspended, has signed a request for reinstatement does not estop him from asserting that such suspension was unlawful. 5. Insurance, § 854*—when action on mutual benefit certificate not prematurely brought. If when a claim is presented against defendant, a fraternal organization, it at first denies liability, an action brought without exhausting certain remedies as required by defendant’s by-laws is not prematurely brought, although such by-laws are expressly made part of the contract, and though plaintiff is expressly required thereby to exhaust such remedies before bringing suit, for the reason that in such case defendant is precluded from setting up the provisions of such by-laws as a defense to the action.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 Ill. App. 501, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-supreme-court-of-independent-order-of-foresters-illappct-1915.