Kelly v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.

269 P.2d 491, 201 Or. 161, 1954 Ore. LEXIS 218
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedApril 14, 1954
StatusPublished

This text of 269 P.2d 491 (Kelly v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd., 269 P.2d 491, 201 Or. 161, 1954 Ore. LEXIS 218 (Or. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Suit to reform $4,000 fire insurance policy so that $2,500 in insurance would be provided at one location, and $1,500 for another location in the city of Portland, Oregon, and for damages for loss occurring at the latter location. Plaintiff prevailed.

One of the assignments of error in this court is that the

“complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of suit for equitable relief by way of reformation of the policy, as there is no allegation of fraud, mistake, or other equitable ground.”

The complaint is deficient in the respects above noted. Boardman v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania, 84 Or 60, 164 P 558.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boardman v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania
164 P. 558 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 P.2d 491, 201 Or. 161, 1954 Ore. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-sun-insurance-office-ltd-or-1954.