Kelly v. State

138 S.W.2d 816, 139 Tex. Crim. 22, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 205
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kelly v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Tex. Crim. 509
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 3, 1940·No. No. 20954.·Published

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area, and by the jury fined the sum of $100.00.

In the complaint and information it is alleged that Lub *23 bock County was a dry area, in that at an election held for that purpose a majority of the qualified voters 'thereof had thus determined, etc.

We find no agreement in the statement of facts relative to such allegations, nor do we find any proof thereof in the statement of facts.

This being a special law, we have held in many cases that proof of its adoption in a certain locality must be made, or an agreement relative thereto in evidence. See Branch’s Penal Code, p. 695, Sec. 1231.

Because of a failure to show in the statement of facts that Lubbock County is a dry area, this judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. State, 138 S.W.2d 816, 139 Tex. Crim. 22, 1940 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 205 (Tex. 1940).

138 S.W.2d 816 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.