Kelly v. State

267 S.W. 1115, 98 Tex. Crim. 595, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 6

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kelly v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 Tex. Crim. 138 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 7, 1925·No. No. 9010.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the district court of Anderson county of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

There being neither statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record, and the indictment and charge of the court appearing to be in conformity with law, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the district court of Anderson county of selling intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

There being neither statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record, and the indictment and charge of the court appearing to be in conformity with law, an affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Kelly v. State, 267 S.W. 1115, 98 Tex. Crim. 595, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 6 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

267 S.W. 1115 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.