Kelly v. State

151 A.D.2d 991, 544 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8314
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 2, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Where, as here, each claimant filed a document within the statutory period prescribed in Court of Claims Act § 10 and the document embodied all of the necessary elements of a claim (Court of Claims Act § 11), the Court of Claims properly determined that each document constituted a valid, timely filed claim against the State (see, Chalmers & Son v State of New York, 271 App Div 699, affd 297 NY 690; Carnesi v State of New York, 140 AD2d 912, 913; Jacobs v State of New York, 129 AD2d 772; Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. State of New York, 121 AD2d 694; Heisler v State of New York, 78 AD2d 767). (Appeal from order of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.— discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. State, 151 A.D.2d 991, 544 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8314 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

151 A.D.2d 991 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fowler Electric Co. v. State
144 Misc. 2d 110 (New York State Court of Claims, 1989)