Kelly v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelly v. State

151 A.D.2d 991, 544 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8314

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 A.D.2d 991 (Kelly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. State, 151 A.D.2d 991, 544 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8314 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Where, as here, each claimant filed a document within the statutory period prescribed in Court of Claims Act § 10 and the document embodied all of the necessary elements of a claim (Court of Claims Act § 11), the Court of Claims properly determined that each document constituted a valid, timely filed claim against the State (see, Chalmers & Son v State of New York, 271 App Div 699, affd 297 NY 690; Carnesi v State of New York, 140 AD2d 912, 913; Jacobs v State of New York, 129 AD2d 772; Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. State of New York, 121 AD2d 694; Heisler v State of New York, 78 AD2d 767). (Appeal from order of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.— discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Where, as here, each claimant filed a document within the statutory period prescribed in Court of Claims Act § 10 and the document embodied all of the necessary elements of a claim (Court of Claims Act § 11), the Court of Claims properly determined that each document constituted a valid, timely filed claim against the State (see, Chalmers & Son v State of New York, 271 App Div 699, affd 297 NY 690; Carnesi v State of New York, 140 AD2d 912, 913; Jacobs v State of New York, 129 AD2d 772; Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. State of New York, 121 AD2d 694; Heisler v State of New York, 78 AD2d 767). (Appeal from order of Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.— discovery.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Lawton and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 A.D.2d 991, 544 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-state-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack