Kelly v. State

88 A.D.2d 613, 450 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16808
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 10, 1982·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the claimants from an order of the Court of Claims (Amann, J.), entered August 12,1981, which denied their motion pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act for leave to file a late notice of claim. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and claimants’ motion to file a late notice of claim is granted. Under the circumstances of this case, the Court of Claims erred when it denied claimants’ motion on the ground that they failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for not filing a timely notice of claim. “[T]he tender of a reasonable excuse * * * is not a precondition to permission to file a late claim such as to constitute a sine qua non for the requested relief * * * Nothing in the statute makes the presence or absence of any one factor determinative.” (Bay Terrace Coop. Section IV v New York State Employees’ Retirement System, Policemen’s & Firemen’s Retirement System, 55 NY2d 979, [614]*614981; Matter of Butler v State of New York, 81 AD2d 834.) In our view, the motion should have been granted. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. State, 88 A.D.2d 613, 450 N.Y.S.2d 45, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

88 A.D.2d 613 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edens v. State
259 A.D.2d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Weaver v. State
112 A.D.2d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Quirk v. Morrissey
106 A.D.2d 498 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Hayden v. Incorporated Village of Hempstead
103 A.D.2d 765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)