Kelly v. State
385 N.E.2d 628, 45 N.Y.2d 973, 412 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2390
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion by Mr. Justice Harry D. Goldman at the Appellate Division (57 AD2d 320). We do not reach the question as to whether the Appellate Division was correct in retroactively applying the amendment to the Court of Claims Act pertaining to late filings, inasmuch [975] as the State has not appealed (see Fuoco v State of New York, 64 AD2d 1030).
Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kelly v. State, 385 N.E.2d 628, 45 N.Y.2d 973, 412 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 2390 (N.Y. 1978).
385 N.E.2d 628 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lavalliere v. Department of Correction
304 A.D.2d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Crawford v. City University
131 Misc. 2d 1013 (New York State Court of Claims, 1986)
Rosenhack v. State
112 Misc. 2d 967 (New York State Court of Claims, 1982)
Robilotto v. State
104 Misc. 2d 713 (New York State Court of Claims, 1980)