Kelly v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Kelly v. State

145 N.E.2d 3, 235 Ind. 699, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 218

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 13, 1956

DocketNo. 0-389

StatusPublished

This text of 145 N.E.2d 3 (Kelly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. State, 145 N.E.2d 3, 235 Ind. 699, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 218 (Ind. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner, Garfield J. Kelly appearing pro se seeks an alternative writ of mandate to compel the Judge of the Vigo Circuit Court to show cause, if any, why petitioner’s verified petition for writ of error coram nobis in forma pauperis should not be set for hearing. The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court. No certified copies of the pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter accompanied the petition, hence it does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court.

For this reason petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner, Garfield J. Kelly appearing pro se seeks an alternative writ of mandate to compel the Judge of the Vigo Circuit Court to show cause, if any, why petitioner’s verified petition for writ of error coram nobis in forma pauperis should not be set for hearing. The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court. No certified copies of the pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter accompanied the petition, hence it does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court.

For this reason petition is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 N.E.2d 3, 235 Ind. 699, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-state-ind-1956.