Kelly v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Kelly v. State

145 N.E.2d 3, 235 Ind. 699, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 218

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided March 13, 1956·No. No. 0-389·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner, Garfield J. Kelly appearing pro se seeks an alternative writ of mandate to compel the Judge of the Vigo Circuit Court to show cause, if any, why petitioner’s verified petition for writ of error coram nobis in forma pauperis should not be set for hearing. The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court. No certified copies of the pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter accompanied the petition, hence it does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court.

For this reason petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petitioner, Garfield J. Kelly appearing pro se seeks an alternative writ of mandate to compel the Judge of the Vigo Circuit Court to show cause, if any, why petitioner’s verified petition for writ of error coram nobis in forma pauperis should not be set for hearing. The relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court. No certified copies of the pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter accompanied the petition, hence it does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court.

For this reason petition is dismissed.

Kelly v. State, 145 N.E.2d 3, 235 Ind. 699, 1956 Ind. LEXIS 218 (Ind. 1956).

Pincite

145 N.E.2d 3 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.