Kelly v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Kelly v. State

150 S.E. 427, 169 Ga. 373, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 361

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 13, 1929

DocketNo. 7014

StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.E. 427 (Kelly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. State, 150 S.E. 427, 169 Ga. 373, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 361 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, P. J.,

From an examination of the evidence it appears that there is no merit in the contention of the plaintiff in error that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. .

Jtidgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. C. F. Richter and Jeff A. Pope, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, Robert B. Short, solicitor-general, and T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.,

From an examination of the evidence it appears that there is no merit in the contention of the plaintiff in error that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. .

Jtidgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. C. F. Richter and Jeff A. Pope, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, Robert B. Short, solicitor-general, and T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E. 427, 169 Ga. 373, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-state-ga-1929.