Kelly v. State

38 So. 3d 828, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8948, 2010 WL 2472199
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kelly v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 987 So. 2d 1237
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 2010·No. 1D09-6124·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the State did not present any evidence as to violation of Condition 12 of appellant’s probation, the order revoking probation should be modified on remand to correct the finding of violation as to that condition. We affirm the violation and sentence, however, because the State proved willful and substantial violation of Condition 4 (“live ... without violating any law”), and the record is clear that the trial court based its order of revocation and its sentence upon the new offense of home invasion robbery, as set out in Condition 4.

AFFIRMED, as modified.

KAHN, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. State, 38 So. 3d 828, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8948, 2010 WL 2472199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

38 So. 3d 828 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.