Kelly v. State

881 So. 2d 62, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12173, 2004 WL 1845541
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 19, 2004·No. No. 1D03-3595·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Moore v. State, 880 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), review pending, No. SC03-2219 (Fla. Dec.18, 2003). Contra Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review [63] pending, No. SC03-2103 (Fla. Nov. 10, 2003).

BENTON, BROWNING, and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. State, 881 So. 2d 62, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12173, 2004 WL 1845541 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

881 So. 2d 62 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houchins v. State
881 So. 2d 62 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)