Kelly v. State

745 So. 2d 1126, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16700, 1999 WL 1136650
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 1999·No. No. 99-1631·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Jay Kelly appeals an order of the trial court finding him to be a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.23(2), Florida Statutes (1993). The State concedes that, because Kelly’s offenses occurred ip 1991, the trial court erred in designating him a sexual predator because the statute states that it applies only to offenses occurring on or after October 1, 1993, See, e.g., Wade v. State, 728 So.2d 284 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Because we find merit to Kelly’s first claim, we do not address the other two issues. We therefore reverse and remand with directions that the trial court strike Kelly’s designation as a sexual predator.

JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. State, 745 So. 2d 1126, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16700, 1999 WL 1136650 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

745 So. 2d 1126 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. State
909 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)