Kelly v. State
623 So. 2d 619, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9089, 1993 WL 337517
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 1993·No. No. 93-1742·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on appellant’s claim that he would not have pleaded guilty if he had known that information concerning his sentence given to him by his counsel prior to the plea was incorrect. See Corbitt v. State, 584 So.2d 231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). We are particularly concerned because appellant has proffered a copy of an alleged letter from counsel which, although dated the day after the sentencing, is some evidence supporting appellant’s allegations as to counsel’s advice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kelly v. State, 623 So. 2d 619, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9089, 1993 WL 337517 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
623 So. 2d 619 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. State
808 So. 2d 1270 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Steel v. State
684 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Jones v. State
636 So. 2d 604 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)