Kelly v. State

561 So. 2d 1364, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4196, 1990 WL 78970
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 13, 1990·No. No. 89-0665·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the sentence imposed and remand so that the trial court may either strike the costs imposed or conduct a hearing in accordance with Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988) and Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Additionally, we remand so that the trial court may correct an apparent clerical error in the judgment in case number 88-3373-CF in which the defendant was adjudicated guilty of armed robbery rather than, as intended, armed burglary. In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

DOWNEY, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. State, 561 So. 2d 1364, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4196, 1990 WL 78970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

561 So. 2d 1364 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Storts v. State
572 So. 2d 562 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)