Kelly v. State

39 S.W.3d 447, 344 Ark. 352, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 202
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMarch 29, 2001
DocketCR 01-00278
StatusPublished

This text of 39 S.W.3d 447 (Kelly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly v. State, 39 S.W.3d 447, 344 Ark. 352, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 202 (Ark. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Don Ethery, a state-salaried, part-time public defender for the First Judicial District, was appointed by the trial court to represent appellant Theodis Kelly, an indigent defendant, in this criminal case. Following a jury trial that concluded on December 7, 2000, Kelly was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to fifty-five years in the Arkansas Department of Correction! A notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction was timely filed and a partial record has been lodged with our clerk.

Mr. Ethery now asks this court to relieve him as counsel for Kelly in this criminal appeal. As a state-salaried, part-time public defender for the First Judicial District, Mr. Ethery is ineligible for compensation by this court for work performed in the appeal of this matter pursuant to our opinion in Rushing v. State, 340 Ark. 84, 8 S.W.3d 489 (2000). In Tester v. State, 341 Ark. 281, 16 S.W.3d 227 (2000), we relieved appellant’s court-appointed public defender and appointed new counsel on appeal under similar circumstances. See also, Craft v. State, 342 Ark. 57, 26 S.W.3d 584 (2000); McFerrin v. State, 342 Ark.61, 26 S.W.3d 429 (2000); Bolton v. State, 342 Ark. 55, 26 S.W.3d 783 (2000). We grant Mr. Ethery’s motion to be relieved for good cause shown. Mr. Robert L. Herzfeld will be substituted as attorney for appellant Theodis Kelly in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ridgway v. TTnT Development Corp.
26 S.W.3d 428 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)
Craft v. State
26 S.W.3d 584 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Bolton v. State
26 S.W.3d 783 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Tester v. State
16 S.W.3d 227 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Rushing v. State
8 S.W.3d 489 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)
Craft v. State
26 S.W.3d 584 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 S.W.3d 447, 344 Ark. 352, 2001 Ark. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-state-ark-2001.