Kelly v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Kelly v. State

78 So. 644, 16 Ala. App. 446, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 128

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 16, 1918

Docket4 Div. 568.

StatusPublished

This text of 78 So. 644 (Kelly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. State, 78 So. 644, 16 Ala. App. 446, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 128 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, P. J.

The only question presented in this case is one of fact. The evidence is in irreconcilable' conflict, and that offered by the state, if believed, is sufficient to support the conclusion that the defendant is guilty as charged. The trial judge was in a better position to judge of the credibility of the witnesses than we are, and we do not feel justified in disturbing the judgment of conviction. Williams v. State, ante, p. 329, 77 South. 923. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, P. J.

The only question presented in this case is one of fact. The evidence is in irreconcilable' conflict, and that offered by the state, if believed, is sufficient to support the conclusion that the defendant is guilty as charged. The trial judge was in a better position to judge of the credibility of the witnesses than we are, and we do not feel justified in disturbing the judgment of conviction. Williams v. State, ante, p. 329, 77 South. 923. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 So. 644, 16 Ala. App. 446, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-state-alactapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack