Kelly v. State
78 So. 644, 16 Ala. App. 446, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 128
Opinion
The only question presented in this case is one of fact. The evidence is in irreconcilable' conflict, and that offered by the state, if believed, is sufficient to support the conclusion that the defendant is guilty as charged. The trial judge was in a better position to judge of the credibility of the witnesses than we are, and we do not feel justified in disturbing the judgment of conviction. Williams v. State, ante, p. 329, 77 South. 923. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kelly v. State, 78 So. 644, 16 Ala. App. 446, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 128 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).
78 So. 644 (Kelly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
77 So. 923 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)