Kelly v. Spada
This text of 202 A.D. 732 (Kelly v. Spada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that plaintiff made out a prima facie case of wrongful discharge, and it was error to dismiss the case as a matter of law, since the language used at the termination of the employment was susceptible of two meanings, and it was for the jury to determine by this language and the subsequent dealings between the parties whether it was the intention to cancel the agreement or not. (See White v. Hoyt, 73 N. Y. 505; Wilson v. New York Contracting Co., 129 App. Div. 125, 129; Howard v. Daly, 61 N. Y. 362.) Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur. Louis Klein, Appellant, v. Joe Winter and Others, Respondents.— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Blaekmar, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 A.D. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-spada-nyappdiv-1922.