Kelly v. Small
This text of 248 A.D.2d 595 (Kelly v. Small) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated August 1, 1996, which granted the motion of the defendant Annette Small to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated November 21, 1994, and for leave to interpose an answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the motion of the defendant Annette Small to vacate the judgment of foreclosure and sale and for leave to interpose an answer. Small established a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense (see, Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 595, 669 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-small-nyappdiv-1998.