Kelly v. Simpson

Fourth Circuit

Kelly v. Simpson

670 F. App'x 803

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2016·No. No. 16-6598·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Simpson, No. 1:15-cv-03647-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 12, 2016). We deny Kelly’s motions for default judgment and for a hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kelly v. Simpson, No. 1:15-cv-03647-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 12, 2016). We deny Kelly’s motions for default judgment and for a hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Kelly v. Simpson, 670 F. App'x 803 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 803 (Kelly v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related