Kelly v. Shinseki
This text of Kelly v. Shinseki (Kelly v. Shinseki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ROSIE L. KELLY, Claimant-Appellant,
v.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. ____________________
2012-7062 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 09-4018, Judge Mary J. Schoelen. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
KENNETH M. CARPENTER, Carpenter, Chartered, of Topeka, Kansas, argued for claimant-appellant.
ERIC P. BRUSKIN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. On the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Acting Assistant Attorney General, JEANNE E. DAVIDSON, Director, MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR. Assistant Director, and JAMES SWEET, Trial Attorney. Of counsel on the brief was MICHAEL J. TIMINSKI, Deputy Assistant General Counsel and TRACEY WARREN, Staff Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 15, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kelly v. Shinseki, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-shinseki-cafc-2013.