Kelly v. Power

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelly v. Power

32 A.D.2d 798, 302 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 9, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 798 (Kelly v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Power, 32 A.D.2d 798, 302 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding (1) to invalidate petitions designating respondent Garelik as a candidate in the Republican Party Primary Election .to be held on June 17, 1969 for nomination for the public office of President of the Council of .the City of New York and (2) for injunctive relief, .petitioners appeal from an order of the 'Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated May 31, 1969, which denied the application and dismissed the petition in .the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appellants are granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Questions of law •have arisen which ought to he reviewed. Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding (1) to invalidate petitions designating respondent Garelik as a candidate in the Republican Party Primary Election .to be held on June 17, 1969 for nomination for the public office of President of the Council of .the City of New York and (2) for injunctive relief, .petitioners appeal from an order of the 'Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated May 31, 1969, which denied the application and dismissed the petition in .the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appellants are granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Questions of law •have arisen which ought to he reviewed. Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 798, 302 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-power-nyappdiv-1969.