Kelly v. Piper

89 S.E.2d 764, 243 N.C. 54, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 704
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 2, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 S.E.2d 764 (Kelly v. Piper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly v. Piper, 89 S.E.2d 764, 243 N.C. 54, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 704 (N.C. 1955).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment or order from which this appeal is taken was entered by the judge in the exercise of his discretionary power. Ordinarily such appeal is premature, and will be dismissed.

Nevertheless, the Court takes notice of its decision entered cotempo-raneously herewith by which error is found in the judgment sought to be pleaded, and a new trial is ordered therein. Hence the alleged basis [55]*55for the order from which appeal is undertaken is wiped out, and the amendment, figuratively, is left suspended in mid-air.

Therefore the Supreme Court in the exercise of its supervisory power over courts of the State, N. C. Const., Art. IV, Sec. 8, In re Stokley, 240 N.C. 658, 83 S.E. 2d 703, ex mero motu, orders the amendment stricken from the record.

The costs of this appeal will be divided between defendants appellant and defendant appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

Amendment stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Wadesboro v. Anson Sanatorium
114 S.E.2d 86 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E.2d 764, 243 N.C. 54, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-piper-nc-1955.