Kelly v. Pima County Sheriff's Department

CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedApril 30, 2025
Docket4:24-cv-00001
StatusUnknown

This text of Kelly v. Pima County Sheriff's Department (Kelly v. Pima County Sheriff's Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly v. Pima County Sheriff's Department, (D. Ariz. 2025).

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Mark William Kelly, No. CV-24-00001-TUC-CKJ

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 Pima County Sheriff's Department, et al.,

13 Defendants. 14 15 The Court assigns this case to the Detainee Track, LRCiv. 16.2(b)(2), because 16 Plaintiff’s Complaint includes an allegation that he was “arrested, i.e., detained at a 17 facility,” for allegedly violating a criminal law in connection with the allegations giving 18 rise to the claims against Defendants, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(c). Because he is not currently in 19 custody, this proceeding is not exempt from initial disclosure requirements under Fed. R. 20 Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(iv). The following Scheduling Order, entered pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 21 16 and LRCiv. 16.2(b)(2)(B)(ii), shall govern the course of this action: 22 IT IS ORDERED that the parties abide by the following case management 23 schedule: 24 A. Joinder of additional parties or amendment of the pleadings shall be requested by 25 June 13, 2025. 26 B. Counsel for Defendants may choose to depose Plaintiff, at Defendants' expense, on 27 or before July 14, 2025. 28 1 C. Parties shall disclose a witness list on or before August 13, 2025. On or before that 2 date, the parties are directed to exchange their complete list of witnesses. 3 D. All discovery, including depositions of parties (other than the plaintiff), witnesses 4 and experts shall be completed by September 15, 2025. No discovery shall take place after 5 that date without leave of Court upon good cause shown. 6 E. Dispositive motions shall be filed on or before October 13, 2025. 7 1. Pursuant to LRCiv 7.2 and LRCiv 56.1, parties may file a motion, response, and 8 reply. No additional briefing on a motion is allowed unless leave of Court is granted. 9 Failure to file a response may be deemed a consent to a granting of the motion. A response 10 must be served and filed within fourteen days of service on the motion; the moving party 11 has seven days from service to serve and file a reply. LRCiv 7.2. Rule 56 motions for 12 summary judgment and Rule 12(b)(1) motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter 13 jurisdiction provide an exception to the above time limits: the time for a response is 30 14 days and the time for a reply is 15 days. LRCiv 56.1. Additional time may be permitted for 15 service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d). Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a motion or 16 response, inclusive of supporting memorandum but exclusive of attachments and statement 17 of facts, shall not exceed 17 pages; a reply shall not exceed 11 pages. LRCiv 7.2. 18 2. Any pleading which is submitted with more than one exhibit must be 19 accompanied by a Table of Contents. The exhibits must be indexed with tabs that 20 correspond to the Table of Contents. Absent exigent circumstances, the Court will not 21 consider pleadings which do not conform to these requirements. 22 F. The parties are directed to submit separate Settlement Status Reports regarding the 23 status of any settlement discussions by close of discovery. The reports shall contain no 24 specific terms of settlement proposals. The reports shall be brief and shall not include any 25 settlement details (i.e., one—two sentences). 26 G. The Joint Proposed Pretrial Order shall be filed within thirty (30) days after 27 resolution of the dispositive motions filed after the end of discovery. If no such motions 28 are filed, a Joint Proposed Pretrial Order will be due October 13, 2025. The content of the 1 proposed pretrial order shall include, but not be limited to, that prescribed in the Form of 2 Pretrial Order attached hereto. 3 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule 37(c), the Court will not allow the parties to 4 offer any exhibits, witnesses or other information that were not previously disclosed in 5 accordance with the provisions of this Order and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or 6 not listed in the Proposed Pretrial Order, except for good cause. 7 2. A jury demand has been made. 8 3. The pretrial conference will be set upon receipt of the Joint Pretrial 9 Order/Statement. The parties responsible for trial of the lawsuit shall appear and participate 10 in the pretrial conference. At the pretrial conference, the Court will set the deadlines for 11 filing and disposing of the following matters: proposed voir dire, jury instructions, trial 12 memorandum, deposition testimony to be used at trial, and motions in limine. 13 H. Motions for extensions of any of the deadlines set forth above shall be governed by 14 Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, LRCiv 7.1, and LRCiv 7.3. A motion for continuance shall be filed 15 prior to the expiration of the deadline. The schedule set forth in this Order may only be 16 modified with leave of Court and upon a showing of good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); 17 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreation, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992) (requiring a showing 18 of good cause under Rule 16 to amend complaint beyond scheduling order deadline). 19 Additionally, any motion for continuance of a discovery deadline, including a stipulation, 20 shall set forth specifically what discovery has been conducted to date, the discovery to be 21 completed, and the reasons why discovery has not been completed within 22 the deadline. 23 This Order contemplates that each party will conduct discovery in such a manner to 24 complete, within the deadline, any and all discovery. "Last minute or eleventh hour" 25 discovery which results in insufficient time to undertake additional discovery, and which 26 requires an extension of the discovery deadline will be met with disfavor, and could result 27 in denial of an extension, exclusion of evidence, or the imposition of other sanctions. 28 1 The parties should note that willful failure to comply with any of the terms of this || Order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or other applicable rules may result in dismissal || of this action without further notice to Plaintiff, or sanctions upon Defendants. Ferdik v. 4|| Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258 (9th Cir. 1992). Plaintiff is cautioned to comply with all applicable 5 || rules of civil procedure; his pro se status will not excuse noncompliance. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565 (9th Cir. 1987). 7 Dated this 29th day of April, 2025. 8 Ee LE Qrgeasee 10 Honorable Cin . J6fgenson United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-_4-

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 , ) ) 9 Plaintiff, ) ) No. CIV -TUC-CKJ 10 vs. ) ) PROPOSED SEPARATE/JOINT 11 , ) PRETRIAL STATEMENT/ORDER ) 12 Defendant. ) ) 13 14 Pursuant to the Scheduling Order entered , 20__, following 15 is the Proposed Final Pretrial Statement/Order to be considered at the pretrial conference. 16 A. COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES 17 Plaintiff(s): 18 Defendant(s): 19 B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kim King and Kent Norman v. Victor Atiyeh
814 F.2d 565 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, Sheriff
963 F.2d 1258 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kelly v. Pima County Sheriff's Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-pima-county-sheriffs-department-azd-2025.