Kelly v. Northrop
28 A. 364, 159 Pa. 537, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 889
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 29, 1894·No. Appeal, No. 114·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We find no error in this record. Neither of the specifications is sustained.
' The order making absolute the plaintiff’s rule on the sheriff to show cause why he should not proceed to execute the writ of habere facias possessionem, etc., is affirmed, with costs to be paid by appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kelly v. Northrop, 28 A. 364, 159 Pa. 537, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 889 (Pa. 1894).
28 A. 364 (Kelly v. Northrop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McKinney v. Russell
68 Pa. Super. 128 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Nehr v. Krewzberg
40 A. 810 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)