Kelly v. National Wholesale Liquidators, Inc.

296 A.D.2d 568, 745 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7749
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 29, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated February 1, 2002, which, inter alia, denied their motion for leave to enter a judgment against the defendant Food Merchants RPG, Inc., upon its default in appearing or answering.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion, inter [569] alia, in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a judgment against the defendant Food Merchants RPG, Inc. (hereinafter Food Merchants), upon its default in appearing or answering. Although Food Merchants’ delay in serving its answer was due to law office failure, the delay was brief and the plaintiffs were not prejudiced thereby (see Khanna v Premium Food & Sports Enter., 279 AD2d 508; Trent v Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Ctr., 277 AD2d 444; Stone v County of Nassau, 272 AD2d 392). Furthermore, there is a potentially meritorious defense (see Trent v Bedford Stuyvesant Restoration Ctr., supra; Stone v County of Nassau, supra). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. National Wholesale Liquidators, Inc., 296 A.D.2d 568, 745 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7749 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

296 A.D.2d 568 (Kelly v. National Wholesale Liquidators, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russo v. U-Store Self Storage, LLC
12 A.D.3d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Nasca v. Town of Brookhaven
4 A.D.3d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)