Kelly v. Moore
18 Abb. N. Cas. 468
Opinion
Mr. Thornton is right in his contention that the exemption of household furniture not exceeding $150 in value, under the act 1874, is in addition to tliatof the same amount of personal property under the act of 1842. And the “set-off’’ may he in money. The authorities cited support this view (see Redfield Surrogate's Pr. 2 ed. 412, note 1, and 413, note 3; and Matter of Miller, 1 Monthly Law Bul. 48).
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kelly v. Moore, 18 Abb. N. Cas. 468 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).
18 Abb. N. Cas. 468 (Kelly v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Griffith
5 Mills Surr. 289 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1906)
Estate of Koch
24 Abb. N. Cas. 468 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1890)