Kelly v. McDonald's Corp.

First Circuit

Kelly v. McDonald's Corp.

15 F. App'x 1

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJuly 2, 2001

Docket00-2410

StatusPublished

This text of 15 F. App'x 1 (Kelly v. McDonald's Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. McDonald's Corp., 15 F. App'x 1 (1st Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The district court dismissed the claims against McDonald’s Corporation for failure to state a claim. Later, the court dismissed any intended “civil rights” claim against Canobie Lake Park for failure to state a cognizable federal claim and, when plaintiff failed to substantiate the requisite amount in controversy for diversity jurisdiction, the remaining claims were dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

*2 Reviewing the judgment de novo in light of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we affirm. See Loc.R. 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The district court dismissed the claims against McDonald’s Corporation for failure to state a claim. Later, the court dismissed any intended “civil rights” claim against Canobie Lake Park for failure to state a cognizable federal claim and, when plaintiff failed to substantiate the requisite amount in controversy for diversity jurisdiction, the remaining claims were dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

*2 Reviewing the judgment de novo in light of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we affirm. See Loc.R. 27(c).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 F. App'x 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-mcdonalds-corp-ca1-2001.