Kelly v. Kennedy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kelly v. Kennedy

13 A.D.2d 747, 216 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10772

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 747 (Kelly v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Kennedy, 13 A.D.2d 747, 216 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points and upon photostatic copies of the exhibits, upon condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s [748]*748points upon the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and flies 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, and one photostatic copy of each exhibit with this court on or before August 15, 1961, with notice of argument for the September 1961 Term of this court, .said proceeding to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur —'Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points and upon photostatic copies of the exhibits, upon condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s [748]*748points upon the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York and flies 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, and one photostatic copy of each exhibit with this court on or before August 15, 1961, with notice of argument for the September 1961 Term of this court, .said proceeding to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur —'Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bastow, JJ,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 747, 216 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-kennedy-nyappdiv-1961.