Kelly v. Kelly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Kelly v. Kelly

62 S.E.2d 55, 232 N.C. 734, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 616

DecidedNovember 29, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 62 S.E.2d 55 (Kelly v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Kelly, 62 S.E.2d 55, 232 N.C. 734, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 616 (N.C. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an order denying the application of the feme plaintiff for an allowance out of the estate or earnings of her husband, the defendant, for subsistence and counsel fees pending the trial of the issues involved in the action. Since Justice Johnson does not sit in this cause and the remainder of the Court are evenly divided in opinion, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed without becoming a precedent. Hinson v. Comrs. of Yadkin, 216 N.C. 806, 6 S.E. 2d 504.

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from an order denying the application of the feme plaintiff for an allowance out of the estate or earnings of her husband, the defendant, for subsistence and counsel fees pending the trial of the issues involved in the action. Since Justice Johnson does not sit in this cause and the remainder of the Court are evenly divided in opinion, the order of the Superior Court is affirmed without becoming a precedent. Hinson v. Comrs. of Yadkin, 216 N.C. 806, 6 S.E. 2d 504.

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 S.E.2d 55, 232 N.C. 734, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-kelly-nc-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack