Kelly v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Kelly v. Kelly

240 S.E.2d 312, 144 Ga. App. 43, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2578

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 17, 1977

Docket54859

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 240 S.E.2d 312 (Kelly v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Kelly, 240 S.E.2d 312, 144 Ga. App. 43, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2578 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

"The present rule as to the presumption of validity of a second marriage was stated in Smith v. Smith, 230 Ga. 616, 618 (198 SE2d 307) (1973), where this court approved the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Zurich Ins. Co. v. Craft, 103 Ga. App. 889 (2) (120 SE2d 635) (1961), as follows: 'Where a party to a ceremonial marriage has been previously married and the validity of the second marriage is challenged, a presumption arises that the second marriage is valid until evidence is adduced that the spouse of the first marriage is living, and only then does the Act of 1957 amending Code § 53-102 (Ga. L. 1957, p. 83), place the burden on the party contending that the second marriage is valid to go forward with the evidence and show that the first marriage was dissolved by divorce.’ ” Patrick v. Simon, 237 Ga. 742 (3) (229 SE2d 746). The appellant was born around 1905 and married at the age of 15. The age of her first spouse, Squire Jones, is not given, but there is no indication in the record that he had been seen alive after her marriage to Kelly in 1926. Her testimony was that she had been informed of his death apparently around the time this marriage took *45 place. In the absence of proof to the contrary, the second marriage being a ceremonial marriage must be presumed valid.

The trial court erred in not sustaining the caveat to the year’s support petition.

Judgment reversed.

Webb and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

"The present rule as to the presumption of validity of a second marriage was stated in Smith v. Smith, 230 Ga. 616, 618 (198 SE2d 307) (1973), where this court approved the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Zurich Ins. Co. v. Craft, 103 Ga. App. 889 (2) (120 SE2d 635) (1961), as follows: 'Where a party to a ceremonial marriage has been previously married and the validity of the second marriage is challenged, a presumption arises that the second marriage is valid until evidence is adduced that the spouse of the first marriage is living, and only then does the Act of 1957 amending Code § 53-102 (Ga. L. 1957, p. 83), place the burden on the party contending that the second marriage is valid to go forward with the evidence and show that the first marriage was dissolved by divorce.’ ” Patrick v. Simon, 237 Ga. 742 (3) (229 SE2d 746). The appellant was born around 1905 and married at the age of 15. The age of her first spouse, Squire Jones, is not given, but there is no indication in the record that he had been seen alive after her marriage to Kelly in 1926. Her testimony was that she had been informed of his death apparently around the time this marriage took *45 place. In the absence of proof to the contrary, the second marriage being a ceremonial marriage must be presumed valid.

The trial court erred in not sustaining the caveat to the year’s support petition.

Judgment reversed.

Webb and Birdsong, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 S.E.2d 312, 144 Ga. App. 43, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-kelly-gactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack