Kelly v. Keizer

10 Ky. 268, 3 A.K. Marsh. 268, 1821 Ky. LEXIS 105
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedApril 9, 1821
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Ky. 268 (Kelly v. Keizer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kelly v. Keizer, 10 Ky. 268, 3 A.K. Marsh. 268, 1821 Ky. LEXIS 105 (Ky. Ct. App. 1821).

Opinion

Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion.

Kelly, having obtained judgment against Keizer in the circuit court, on an attachment under the law regulating proceedings against absconding debtors, Keizer, at. a subsequent term, moved the court, and it accordingly, upon the introduction of extraneous evidence, set aside thejudgment ®rst ren(Jere^ ,n favor of Kelly.

To reverse the decision, setting aside the first judgment, this writ of error has been proseeuted by Kelly,

This court is of opinion, the court possessed no power, at 3 subsequent term, to set aside thejudgment first rendered. It is a settled principle, that the power of courts over their judgments, cease with the term at which the jU(%i»ent is given. If the judgment itself be erroneous, it can only be corrected, by appeal or writ of error to this court; or, if the proceeding be irregular in a matter proper j- writ of error coram vobis, redress mav be obtained in that mode, in the same court. Rut in neither case, is it competent for the court, on motioo, to set aside a judgment rendered at a previous term.

Thejudgment must be reversed with cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Ky. 268, 3 A.K. Marsh. 268, 1821 Ky. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-keizer-kyctapp-1821.