Kelly v. Justice Administrative Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kelly v. Justice Administrative Commission

99 So. 3d 627, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18488, 2012 WL 5233539

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 24, 2012

DocketNo. 2D12-2477

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 So. 3d 627 (Kelly v. Justice Administrative Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Justice Administrative Commission, 99 So. 3d 627, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18488, 2012 WL 5233539 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Edward J. Kelly seeks certiorari review of an order awarding him $4000 in attorney’s fees for his representation of an indigent criminal defendant, instead of the $20,895 he requested. Kelly contends the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in limiting his fees without making a finding as to the reasonable number of hours he worked in representing his client. We agree.

In awarding fees to an attorney appointed pursuant to statute, the trial court must find that appointed counsel reasonably expended a certain number of hours in representing the indigent client, and then, using the established hourly rate, compute the fee. Swartz v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Manatee Cnty., 842 So.2d 980, 982 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Zelman v. Justice Admin. Comm’n, 78 So.3d 105, 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). The Justice Administrative Commission concedes the trial court order constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of the law because the court failed to make appropriate findings regarding the reasonable number of hours expended by Kelly. Accordingly, we grant the petition, quash the fee award, and remand for reconsideration. On remand, if the trial court determines an award greater than the statutory cap is justified, it should make the appropriate findings to support the award. See Zelman, 78 So.3d at 106-07 (and cases cited therein).

Petition granted.

VILLANTI and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELLY, Judge.

Edward J. Kelly seeks certiorari review of an order awarding him $4000 in attorney’s fees for his representation of an indigent criminal defendant, instead of the $20,895 he requested. Kelly contends the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law in limiting his fees without making a finding as to the reasonable number of hours he worked in representing his client. We agree.

In awarding fees to an attorney appointed pursuant to statute, the trial court must find that appointed counsel reasonably expended a certain number of hours in representing the indigent client, and then, using the established hourly rate, compute the fee. Swartz v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Manatee Cnty., 842 So.2d 980, 982 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Zelman v. Justice Admin. Comm’n, 78 So.3d 105, 107 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). The Justice Administrative Commission concedes the trial court order constitutes a departure from the essential requirements of the law because the court failed to make appropriate findings regarding the reasonable number of hours expended by Kelly. Accordingly, we grant the petition, quash the fee award, and remand for reconsideration. On remand, if the trial court determines an award greater than the statutory cap is justified, it should make the appropriate findings to support the award. See Zelman, 78 So.3d at 106-07 (and cases cited therein).

Petition granted.

VILLANTI and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 So. 3d 627, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18488, 2012 WL 5233539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-justice-administrative-commission-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack