Kelly v. Hopkins

75 N.W. 374, 72 Minn. 258, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 670
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 13, 1898·No. Nos. 10,988-(90)·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

START, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion to dismiss the appeal of the administrator of the estate of Frank C. Kelly, deceased, from an order of the probate court refusing to set aside its previous order making an allowance to the appellant as the widow of the deceased. The respondent moves this court to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that such an order is not appealable. The motion must be granted, for an order of the district court refusing to dismiss an appeal is not appealable. It does not involve the merits of the action or any part thereof. It is not an order which, in effect, determines the case and prevents a judgment from which an appeal may be taken, or a final order affecting a substantial right in a special proceeding. See McMahon v. Davidson, 12 Minn. 232 (357); Gurney v. City of St. Paul, 36 Minn. 163, 30 N. W. 661; Exley v. Berryhill, 36 Minn. 117, 30 N. W. 436; Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Menage, 66 Minn. 447, 69 N. W. 224.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. Hopkins, 75 N.W. 374, 72 Minn. 258, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 670 (Mich. 1898).

75 N.W. 374 (Kelly v. Hopkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vokich v. Inland Coal & Dock Co.
281 N.W. 713 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1938)
McGinty v. Kelley
88 N.W. 430 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1901)