Kelly v. Hedden

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Kelly v. Hedden

31 F. 607, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided July 23, 1887·Published

Opinion

Lacombe, J.

The questions raised by the demurrer are the same considered in tho eases of Bartram v. Robertson, 15 Fed. Rep. 212, (recently affirmed in the supreme court, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1115;) Whitney v. Robertson, 21 Fed. Rep. 566, and Netherclift v. Robertson, 27 Fed. Rep. 737; and, for the reasons stated in the opinions there delivered, the demurrer is sustained.

Judgment is ordered for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacombe, J.

The questions raised by the demurrer are the same considered in tho eases of Bartram v. Robertson, 15 Fed. Rep. 212, (recently affirmed in the supreme court, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1115;) Whitney v. Robertson, 21 Fed. Rep. 566, and Netherclift v. Robertson, 27 Fed. Rep. 737; and, for the reasons stated in the opinions there delivered, the demurrer is sustained.

Judgment is ordered for the defendant.

Kelly v. Hedden, 31 F. 607, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318 (circtsdny 1887).

Pincite

31 F. 607 (Kelly v. Hedden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.