Kelly v. Hedden

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Kelly v. Hedden

31 F. 607, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedJuly 23, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 31 F. 607 (Kelly v. Hedden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Hedden, 31 F. 607, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318 (circtsdny 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Lacombe, J.

The questions raised by the demurrer are the same considered in tho eases of Bartram v. Robertson, 15 Fed. Rep. 212, (recently affirmed in the supreme court, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1115;) Whitney v. Robertson, 21 Fed. Rep. 566, and Netherclift v. Robertson, 27 Fed. Rep. 737; and, for the reasons stated in the opinions there delivered, the demurrer is sustained.

Judgment is ordered for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacombe, J.

The questions raised by the demurrer are the same considered in tho eases of Bartram v. Robertson, 15 Fed. Rep. 212, (recently affirmed in the supreme court, 7 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1115;) Whitney v. Robertson, 21 Fed. Rep. 566, and Netherclift v. Robertson, 27 Fed. Rep. 737; and, for the reasons stated in the opinions there delivered, the demurrer is sustained.

Judgment is ordered for the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 F. 607, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-hedden-circtsdny-1887.