Kelly v. Hakes

Appellate Court of Illinois

Kelly v. Hakes

190 Ill. App. 210

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided July 31, 1914·No. Gen. No. 5,922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Me. Presiding Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Replevin, § 17*—right of action as between tenants in common. A part owner of a chattel cannot maintain replevin therefor as against his co-owner in possession. 3. Replevin, § 163*-—costs. The general rule that the prevailing party is entitled to costs is not applicable in replevin cases where the plaintiff fails to recover all the property replevied. 4. Appeal and error, § 1032*—questions not raised for review. The manner of apportioning costs is not presented for review where the only argument on appeal goes to the right to make an apportionment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me. Presiding Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Replevin, § 17*—right of action as between tenants in common. A part owner of a chattel cannot maintain replevin therefor as against his co-owner in possession. 3. Replevin, § 163*-—costs. The general rule that the prevailing party is entitled to costs is not applicable in replevin cases where the plaintiff fails to recover all the property replevied. 4. Appeal and error, § 1032*—questions not raised for review. The manner of apportioning costs is not presented for review where the only argument on appeal goes to the right to make an apportionment.

Kelly v. Hakes, 190 Ill. App. 210 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

190 Ill. App. 210 (Kelly v. Hakes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related