Kelly v. Gartner

51 N.W. 278, 90 Mich. 264
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided February 10, 1892·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This motion is ruled by S. C. Hall Lumber Co. v. Gustin, 54 Mich. 624.

[265]*265A party cannot demand an examination in open court of witnesses in a chancery case until the cause is at issue as to all of the defendants, or until those who have not answered are defaulted.

Writ granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. Gartner, 51 N.W. 278, 90 Mich. 264 (Mich. 1892).

51 N.W. 278 (Kelly v. Gartner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Letts v. Trevallick
102 N.W. 661 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)