Kelly v. Ferguson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Kelly v. Ferguson

1911 OK CR 222, 115 P. 284, 5 Okla. Crim. 700, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 164

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 2, 1911

DocketNo. A-1095.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 222 (Kelly v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Ferguson, 1911 OK CR 222, 115 P. 284, 5 Okla. Crim. 700, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 164 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to require Hon. George W. Ferguson, county judge of Blaine county, Oklahoma, to disqualify himself from acting as judge in the trial of a cause pending in the county court of Blaine county, Oklahoma, wherein petitioner is charged with the offense of criminal libel. This is a companion case to the case of Kelly v. Ferguson (ante), which was decided by this court on the 4th day of April, 1911. The parties to both cases are the same and the facts relied upon in both cases are the same, except that petitioner is charged with being guilty of criminal libel upon two separate and distinct persons in the different cases. The decision of this court in the cause decided on the 4th day of April is decisive of the question presented in this case. The writ of mandamus will therefore issue as prayed for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to require Hon. George W. Ferguson, county judge of Blaine county, Oklahoma, to disqualify himself from acting as judge in the trial of a cause pending in the county court of Blaine county, Oklahoma, wherein petitioner is charged with the offense of criminal libel. This is a companion case to the case of Kelly v. Ferguson (ante), which was decided by this court on the 4th day of April, 1911. The parties to both cases are the same and the facts relied upon in both cases are the same, except that petitioner is charged with being guilty of criminal libel upon two separate and distinct persons in the different cases. The decision of this court in the cause decided on the 4th day of April is decisive of the question presented in this case. The writ of mandamus will therefore issue as prayed for.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 222, 115 P. 284, 5 Okla. Crim. 700, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-ferguson-oklacrimapp-1911.