Kelly v. Duffy

8 Sadler 214
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 31, 1887·No. No. 223, W. D.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We find no error in the rulings of the learned judge below ir/ bis answers to the points. Those presented by the plaintiff asked' the learned judge to withdraw the facts from the jury, which... under the evidence, he could not do. The single point of the-defendant was properly answered. It was a case for a jury., and it went to them under correct instructions.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kelly v. Duffy, 8 Sadler 214 (Pa. 1887).

8 Sadler 214 (Kelly v. Duffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mumma v. Club Plan of America
6 Pa. D. & C.2d 266 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1955)
Brinton v. School Dist. of Shenango Twp.
81 Pa. Super. 450 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)