Kelly v. Donnini Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kelly v. Donnini Enterprises, Inc.

937 So. 2d 1175, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14872, 2006 WL 2547354

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 6, 2006

DocketNo. 4D05-4603

StatusPublished

This text of 937 So. 2d 1175 (Kelly v. Donnini Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Donnini Enterprises, Inc., 937 So. 2d 1175, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14872, 2006 WL 2547354 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Leslie Kelly, a former employee of a convenience store owned by Donnini Enterprises, Inc. (hereinafter “Donnini”), sued Donnini and Bill Fagan, one of its store managers, for negligence and defamation. The trial court entered final summary judgment in favor of defendant Donnini on both counts. “ ‘Summary judgment should not be granted unless the facts are so clear and undisputed that only questions of law remain.’ ” Sulkin v. [1176]*1176All Fla. Pain Mgmt., Inc., 932 So.2d 485, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (quoting Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA 731 So.2d 638, 643 (Fla.1999)). We affirm the summary judgment on the negligence claim, but find that issues of fact remain regarding the defamation action and Don-nini’s vicarious liability for Fagan’s statements, rendering summary judgment inappropriate at this juncture.

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.

STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Leslie Kelly, a former employee of a convenience store owned by Donnini Enterprises, Inc. (hereinafter “Donnini”), sued Donnini and Bill Fagan, one of its store managers, for negligence and defamation. The trial court entered final summary judgment in favor of defendant Donnini on both counts. “ ‘Summary judgment should not be granted unless the facts are so clear and undisputed that only questions of law remain.’ ” Sulkin v. [1176]*1176All Fla. Pain Mgmt., Inc., 932 So.2d 485, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (quoting Dade County Sch. Bd. v. Radio Station WQBA 731 So.2d 638, 643 (Fla.1999)). We affirm the summary judgment on the negligence claim, but find that issues of fact remain regarding the defamation action and Don-nini’s vicarious liability for Fagan’s statements, rendering summary judgment inappropriate at this juncture.

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.

STEVENSON, C.J., STONE and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

937 So. 2d 1175, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14872, 2006 WL 2547354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-donnini-enterprises-inc-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack