Kelly v. Department of Highways

West Virginia Court of Claims

Kelly v. Department of Highways

15 Ct. Cl. 14

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedOctober 4, 1983

DocketCC-82-303

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ct. Cl. 14 (Kelly v. Department of Highways) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kelly v. Department of Highways, 15 Ct. Cl. 14 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Claimant seeks $259.55 for damages to her 1975 AMC Pacer incur[15]*15red on August 1, 1982. Claimant was driving on Route 119/12 near Morgantown, Monongalia County, West Virginia, when she drove over a boulder in the road causing damage to the vehicle. She testified that the boulder has been in the road for at least 40 years.

James A. Trickett, a supervisor with respondent, testified that Route 119/12 is a one-lane, low-priority, dirt road which the respondent is required to inspect and maintain only on a yearly basis. Mr. Trickett described the boulder as being embedded in the road’s surface. The boulder has been there since the road was built. According to Mr. Trickett, the boulder is of the same contour as the road, and he stated that he had no way of knowing the size or depth of the boulder.

After careful consideration of the evidence presented, the Court can find no basis for liability on the part of respondent. The presence of the boulder was not due to the acts or omissions of respondent, but was a pre-existing condition of the road over which respondent had no control. As no negligence has been shown, the Court must deny the claim.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Claimant seeks $259.55 for damages to her 1975 AMC Pacer incur[15]*15red on August 1, 1982. Claimant was driving on Route 119/12 near Morgantown, Monongalia County, West Virginia, when she drove over a boulder in the road causing damage to the vehicle. She testified that the boulder has been in the road for at least 40 years.

James A. Trickett, a supervisor with respondent, testified that Route 119/12 is a one-lane, low-priority, dirt road which the respondent is required to inspect and maintain only on a yearly basis. Mr. Trickett described the boulder as being embedded in the road’s surface. The boulder has been there since the road was built. According to Mr. Trickett, the boulder is of the same contour as the road, and he stated that he had no way of knowing the size or depth of the boulder.

After careful consideration of the evidence presented, the Court can find no basis for liability on the part of respondent. The presence of the boulder was not due to the acts or omissions of respondent, but was a pre-existing condition of the road over which respondent had no control. As no negligence has been shown, the Court must deny the claim.

Claim disallowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ct. Cl. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kelly-v-department-of-highways-wvctcl-1983.